IN A NUTSHELL

Osteogenic effects of resistance versus impact-loading training in young women: The OPTIMA-Ex trial

Amy T. Harding & Conor Lambert

doi: 10.13140/RG.2.2.10765.900080

March 2020

It is well accepted that the bone response to physical activity is highly dependent on the nature of the exercise. Despite this, few studies have directly compared the effect of impact-style exercise (predominantly gravity-derived loading of bone) and resistance training (predominantly muscle-derived loading of bone) on bone geometry and strength. Also, few trials have examined the effects of bone-targeted exercise interventions on bone mass and strength parameters of the upper and lower limbs in young adult women using two-dimensional (DXA) and three-dimensional peripheral quantitative computed tomography (pQCT) imaging modalities.

Our study, published in Bone, was the first to explore the site-specific effects of different exercise modalities (impact versus resistance training) on bone parameters in young adult women. We compared the effects of two twice-weekly supervised exercise modalities over 10 months (high-impact loading vs. high-intensity resistance training) on bone mass, geometry and strength of both the upper (radius) and lower limbs (femoral neck and tibia) of young physically inactive women with lower than average bone mass.

We recruited physically inactive young adult women (18-30 years) with below average bone mass (T-score ≤ 0 at the lumbar spine and proximal femur) as part of the OPTIMA-Ex randomised controlled exercise intervention trial. High-intensity impact training (IT) sessions comprised upper limb punching (jab, cross and hook) and lower limb landing (unidirectional and multidirectional jumping and hopping) exercises performed at ≥ 4 times body weight. High-intensity resistance training (RT) sessions comprised of barbell-based upper limb (bench press, over-head press and bent over row) and lower limb (deadlift, squat and calf raise) exercises performed at ≥ 85% of one repetition maximum. Testing was conducted at baseline and 10-month follow-up. DXA scans of the femoral neck and distal radius were performed. Proximal femur scans were reanalysed with 3D hip software. pQCT scans of the tibiae and radii were also performed to determine geometric, densitometric and biomechanical strength indices for the cortical and trabecular bone compartments. Ten participants completed the IT and 12 completed the RT arms of the trial. Training program compliance was similar (IT 61.4% vs. RT 66.4%).

Our study found that the two exercise modalities provided differing site-specific effects on bone mass and indices of bone strength in both the upper and lower limbs in young adult women with below average bone mass, likely due to localised adaptation in bone structure and distribution at the sites subjected to the greatest strain. Findings indicated that IT (predominantly gravity-derived loading) evoked greater improvements at distal sites of both the radius and tibia, while RT (predominantly muscle-derived loading) appeared to have a greater effect on the shafts of the radius and tibia, and at the femoral neck. Overall, this suggests that IT may improve indices of bone strength in the distal ends of upper and lower limb long bones, likely as this is the location of the greatest mechanical load (i.e. closest to the site of impact during punching and jump landings). By contrast, RT may exert greater effects on cortical bone in the proximal femur and the shafts of long bones of the upper and lower limbs due to muscle contraction subjecting bone to bending forces. It is important to remember that the participants in our study were both on and off hormonal contraceptives, and the sample size was relatively low, thus further investigations will help clarify the mechanisms underpinning bone adaptation in this population.

These findings are described in the article entitled “Regional changes in indices of bone strength of upper and lower limbs in response to high-intensity impact loading or high-intensity resistance training” published in BoneThis work was conducted by Conor Lambert, Amy T. Harding, Belinda R. Beck, Steven L. Watson, and Benjamin K. Weeks from Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, School of Allied Health Sciences, Gold Coast, Queensland, Australia. The study was an unfunded PhD project which received no specific grant.

Nutshell-ATH
Amy T. Harding
Nutshell-CM
Conor Lambert

Menzies Health Institute Queensland, Griffith University, Queensland, Australia.